Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


American Speech 2006 81(1):31-55; DOI:10.1215/00031283-2006-002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WEBELHUTH, G.
Right arrow Articles by DANNENBERG, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Duke University Press

SOUTHERN AMERICAN ENGLISH PERSONAL DATIVES: THE THEORETICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF DIALECTAL VARIATION

GERT WEBELHUTH

University of Göttingen

CLARE J. DANNENBERG

Virginia Polytechnic Institute

The Southern Double Object Construction, a regular form in Southern vernacular varieties of American English, is well attested. Among speakers of Southern Vernacular English, its use is not stigmatized, and it appears that it can be exchanged variably with its mainstream English approximate, the "self" reflexive (e.g., Shei went to the store to get heri some candy vs. Shei went to the store to get herselfi some candy). In this article, we contextualize the Southern Double Object Construction within the scope of syntactic literature on double object constructions. We contend that although syntactic theories, such as the Principles and Parameters model, can explain Southern Double Object Constructions in general terms, they overlook idiosyncratic, language-specific properties that we argue, like Fillmore, Kay, and O'Connor (1988), constitute theoretically important information essential to evaluation of a grammar.







  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2006 by American Dialect Society