|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Enregisterment |
Carnegie Mellon University
This article considers a type of material artifact that circulates ideas about regional speech in the United States: T-shirts bearing words and phrases thought to be unique to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. I argue that Pittsburghese shirts, seen for themselves and in the context of their production, distribution, and consumption, are part of a process leading to the creation and focusing of the idea that there is a Pittsburgh dialect. To describe how particular locally hearable forms have become linked with the city, I invoke Asif Agha's concept of "enregisterment." To understand why this has happened at the time and in the way it has, I draw on Arjun Appadurai's model of the "commodity situation." I suggest that Pittsburghese shirts contribute to dialect enregisterment in at least four ways: they put local speech on display, they imbue local speech with value, they standardize local speech, and they link local speech with particular social meanings.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Remlinger EVERYONE UP HERE: ENREGISTERMENT AND IDENTITY IN MICHIGAN'S KEWEENAW PENINSULA American Speech, June 1, 2009; 84(2): 118 - 137. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Beal ENREGISTERMENT, COMMODIFICATION, AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT: "GEORDIE" VERSUS "SHEFFIELDISH" American Speech, June 1, 2009; 84(2): 138 - 156. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Remlinger, J. Salmons, and L. Von Schneidemesser REVISED PERCEPTIONS: CHANGING DIALECT PERCEPTIONS IN WISCONSIN AND MICHIGAN'S UPPER PENINSULA American Speech, June 1, 2009; 84(2): 176 - 191. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
|
|